Friday Freaky Fatwa--Geert Wilders

A Muslim asks a scholar
A Dutch film was released that maligns Islam and Muslims, and describes them as terrorists. What is your advice to the Muslims concerning this matter?
The answer is so bad, so twisted, so whacked out that I couldn’t even make comments.  That has never happened

Praise be to Allah.

Firstly:
 

The conflict between truth and falsehood is an ancient one. The troops of falsehood continue to confront the truth at all times and in all places. But Allah caused them to be defeated by the strength of the truth and He hurls the truth against falsehood and destroys it, so it is bound to vanish.

Ever since satan was humiliated and refused to respond to the command of Allah to prostrate to Adam, he began to plot against the truth and its followers. satan asked his Lord for a respite, not so that he could repent, but so that he could plot, and increase the number of his followers and bring them into the Fire of Allah, where he will stand and address them, saying:

14:22 “ And Satan will say when the matter is decided:‘Verily, Allah promised you a promise of truth. And I too promised you, but I betrayed you. I had no authority over you except that I called you, and you responded to me. So blame me not, but blame yourselves. I cannot help you, nor can you help me. I deny your former act in associating me as a partner with Allah. Verily, there is a painful torment for the polytheists and wrongdoers’”

Secondly:

Islam has faced many great plots, but Allah has guaranteed to protect His religion, because He has made it the best of religions and the final religion.
Actually, it’s a knock off of the original religion and the desert Arabs were the Last to get the message.

Thirdly:

Here we are dealing with a new incident, but it will not be the last, because of the devils among mankind and the jinn and their ultimately hopeless attempts to impugn this religion, this Prophet and this Holy Book.

This incident is what has been wrought by the sinful hands of a man called Geert Wilders, the leader of the “Freedom” Party, which is a right-wing, racist Dutch party. He wanted to slander this great religion in order to become well known and to make political gains, but Allah foiled him and he will be foiled time and again, in sha Allah.

This hater made a short film of seventeen minutes about Islam and the Quran, filled with lies and fabrications, and he called it “Fitnah”! If what he said was presented to an academic institution or university, he would deserve to be rebuked and scorned, because of his lack of objectivity, and because of his distortion of facts.

His film starts and ends with an offensive image of the Prophet that was drawn by the sinful, criminal hands of the Danish artist. At the beginning it shows a bomb in the turban of the so-called picture of the Prophet, where the fuse has just been lit. At the end of the film, the fuse has burnt down, then it explodes. Thus he wants to send the despicable message that Islam came to wreak havoc and destruction, and that remaining silent about it will lead to the demise of non-Muslim civilizations and nations.

Fourthly:

We can divide our opinions about this evil film into a number of categories:

1. Verses which are quoted out of context and their meanings distorted.

For example:

(a) The first verse to be quoted in his film is (interpretation of the meaning):

8:60 “And make ready against them all you can of power, including steeds of war (tanks, planes, missiles, artillery) to threaten the enemy of Allah and your enemy, and others besides…”

The quotation reaches this point but does not complete it. He wants to highlight the word “threaten” to indicate that Islam equals terrorism, which is how many haters and ignorant people want to label Islam.

We are not ashamed of what is in the Book of Allah and we do not deny this verse, rather we worship Allah by reciting it, and we ask Him to help us to act in accordance with it. But we reject his quoting this part of it on the basis of two things, to keep the discussion short:

Firstly, what he is denouncing Islam for is something that is done by all great and mighty nations. They produce lethal weapons, atomic bombs, planes, submarines and so on, to defend themselves and to threaten their enemies lest anyone attack them. This is what is meant in this verse. The kaafirs who occupy Muslim lands could not have dared to do so except when the Muslims ceased to implement this verse. The most recent example of that is Iraq, where they put pressure on the government to destroy their weapons and missiles, then when that had been done and confirmed, they invaded and occupied the land, and mistreated its people.

Secondly, understanding the context of the verse properly will prove wrong the label of terrorism that he wants to apply to Islam, as he and his gang understand it. The verse which comes directly after this one says (interpretation of the meaning):

8:61 “But if they incline to peace, you also incline to it, and trust in Allah. Verily, He is the All-Hearer, the All-Knower”

(b) The second verse that is heard in the film is (interpretation of the meaning):

4:56 “Surely, those who disbelieved in Our Ayaat, We shall burn them in Fire. As often as their skins are roasted through, We shall change them for other skins that they may taste the punishment. Truly, Allah is Ever Most Powerful, All‑Wise”

The deception here is that this movie director quotes this verse to show viewers that Islam enjoins burning those who go against it until their skin is cooked, and this is something that Allah has prescribed for them.

This may be refuted on two counts:

Firstly, what he does is a foolish deception, because in this verse Allah is speaking of the punishment of the kaafirs on the Day of Resurrection, not in this world. It is followed by mention of the reward of the believers who affirm His Oneness:

4:57 “But those who believe and do deeds of righteousness, We shall admit them to Gardens under which rivers flow, abiding therein forever. Therein they shall have purified mates, and We shall admit them to shades wide and ever deepening ”

Secondly, even the briefest pondering of this verse will show the lies, fabrications and misquotations of this director. In this verse, Allah says “We shall change them for other skins”. Are the Muslims able to change the skins of those whose skins are burned in this world?!

(a) Pictures of a group of Raafidis – Shi’ah – wounding themselves and their children with sharp tools, causing their heads to bleed, in a disgusting scene. This is not part of our religion, rather it is done by some of those who call themselves Muslims out of ignorance and misguidance on their part.

The picture which shows swords being held aloft covered with blood is also an image of the Shi’ah on their special occasions, but the lying filmmaker wants to make people think that these are Muslims and that they have just finished a party where kaafirs’ heads were cut off.

(b) Another ridiculous and clearly false image is the picture of Muslim women in niqaab waving placards on which it is written “God bless Hitler”!

We say: This is clearly a lie and a fabrication. In our religion we are forbidden to pray for the one who dies a kaafir. Allah says (interpretation of the meaning):

9:113 “It is not (proper) for the Prophet and those who believe to ask Allah’s forgiveness, even though they be of kin, after it has become clear to them that they are the dwellers of the Fire (because they died in a state of disbelief)”

How can women who wear niqaab and adhere to the rulings of Islam pray for blessing for Hitler?

For example:

(a) A fabricated meeting with a little girl. It is obvious that they have not presented her or fabricated her story very well, for two reasons:

Firstly, she is wearing hijab, and they are asking her about her religion. It is obvious that she is acting.

Secondly, the child who was acting was asked about her opinion of Jews and Christians and she said that they are monkeys and pigs.

This is not part of our religion; Islam does not say that the Jews and Christians are monkeys and pigs, rather it says that a group of Jews in the past tried to use tricks to circumvent the laws of their Lord, so Allah punished them by turning them into monkeys. Allah says (interpretation of the meaning):

2:65 “And indeed you knew those amongst you who transgressed in the matter of the Sabbath (Saturday). We said to them: ‘Be you monkeys, despised and rejected’”

“So when they exceeded the limits of what they were prohibited, We said to them: ‘Be you monkeys, despised and rejected’”

(b) Showing video clips out of context, such as the clip of a preacher who brandishes a sword and threatens the kuffaar.

This Shaykh is well known. He was Iraqi and he waved the sword during his sermon to encourage the people to fight against the kuffaar who are occupying his country, and he was killed by the Raafidis – may they get from Allah what they deserve. (I think they already did as the dude is dead) What does he expect the Muslims to do if their land is occupied? Give up their wealth and their honour, and wait to be killed, or approve and forgive the criminal occupier?! No, Islam is a religion of pride and dignity, and the Muslims refuse to be humiliated; they have no alternative but to fight the occupier. This is confirmed by every religion and law on earth. In fact the leader of the occupation himself said, “If my country were occupied I would fight the occupier.” If we assume that he would indeed fight and not run away, he is only speaking the truth, i.e., that the occupier is to be fought.

What is wrong with the Muslims fighting a jihad against those who occupy their land?
What’s wrong with non Muslims fighting a jihad against those who disrupt their country?

Fifthly:

The main ideas of the film are all aimed at insulting Islam by mocking and making fun of the Prophet; by reviling the Quran and calling it a “fascist” book, as it says in the film; and by warning of the danger of mosques.
Hellfire, even the Quran warns of mosques, look!
9:107 And there are those who put up a mosque by way of mischief and infidelity - to disunite the Believers - and in preparation for one who warred against Allah and His Messenger aforetime. They will indeed swear that their intention is nothing but good; But Allah doth declare that they are certainly liars.

All of that the filmmaker tries to do in his short film by use of video clips, moving images and the accompanying music, but he fails miserably, because he uses lies, falsification and deceit, which will never be accepted by the viewer, even if he is a kaafir.

But Allah has caused his plot to backfire, because the people in Holland are rushing to buy Islamic books and copies of the Quran, to see what is in them, and they will see in them that which will show the falseness and fabrication of what this failed filmmaker has produced. This has indeed happened; three people from that country became Muslim after watching the film, and Dutch companies have threatened to take this filmmaker, who is also an MP, to court if Muslim countries boycott their products. Thus this MP will be humiliated and shamed, and the evil plot will not affect anyone but its authors.
Maybe Muslims should just boycott Holland and all western countries.

Sixthly:

Allah has clearly supported His religion. Since the launch of the movie was announced, non-Muslim organizations, governments and individuals have denounced this filmmaking MP, and stated that Islam has nothing to do with violence and terrorism, and that Muslims themselves are victims of terrorism as well as others. Among those who have denounced and objected to the actions of this filmmaking MP is the Prime Minister of the Netherlands, who said strong words against it; the Secretary of the United Nations; the European Union; and a number of politicians, leaders and countries. Satellite channels, both public and private, have refused to show this film, and he could only find one web site that would publish it.

In Brussels, the European Parliament condemned this offensive film, and the President of the Parliament, Hans-Gert Pöttering, attacked the Dutch MP Wilders, saying: The contents of the film seem designed to stir up the religious sensitivities of Muslims in the Netherlands, Europe and worldwide.
And he knew what would happen….violence.

He added: On behalf He added: On behalf of the European Parliament, I emphatically refuse to accept the film’s message that Islam is a violent religion – indicating that he fully endorsed the statement of the Dutch government which rejected the film “Fitnah”.
And then he adds this….

Similarly, the European Union issued a statement that it regarded the fifteen-minute-long film as hostile and offensive to Islam, and likely to spread hate. End quote.

As for the Muslims, they took action to denounce and condemn the film, and they issued statements and warnings against continuing to malign the symbols of our religion. Some countries threatened to cut ties with the Netherlands, and MPs in some countries demanded the expulsion of the Dutch ambassador and boycotts of Dutch products. Despite the weakness and disunity in which the Muslims are living, this was regarded as great support for Islam, as there are people among both the kuffaar and the Muslims who are defending our religion. The Prime Minister of the Netherlands himself sent a letter to the Shaykh of al-Azhar, stating that his government objected to the production and showing of this film, and that a case had been brought before the Dutch courts.
I couldn’t help but notice that he acknowledges the kuffaar defending Muslims.  Wouldn’t mind seeing Muslims defend the ‘kuffaar’

How would the situation be if the Muslims were truly united and they had the strength to instil respect and awe in the hearts of those haters and fabricators?

Seventhly:

It seems to us that this lying MP wanted to achieve certain aims by making this film, including the following:

1. Personal gain, fame and victory at the polls.

2. Pleasing the Jews. That is obvious in his film, as in a number of clips he expresses sympathy for them. But they are occupiers and criminals. At the same time as he speaks of killing by Muslims, he forgets or pretends to forget two things:

(i) That the one who burned millions of Jews was a Christian, namely Hitler, who said in his book Mein Kampf that this was on the orders of God!

(ii) That the Jews killed and expelled a great number of Muslims, and they were not ashamed to call their latest battle against Gaza a “holocaust”.

3. Alerting the West to the high percentages of Muslims in their countries, and saying that large numbers of Muslims poses a danger to Europe.

4. Alerting Europe in general, and the Netherlands in particular, to the spread of mosques in their lands. This is clear from his showing pictures of mosques in the Netherlands, to warn of their presence.

5. Attempting to ban circulation of Qurans in Europe, and computing the Holy Quran to Hitler’s book Mein Kampf! Hence he describes the Quran as “fascist”, which is a word that is indicative of violence and harshness

Allah has humiliated this filmmaking MP by means of this pathetic work that is filled with lies and fabrications. People will see the difference between lies and the truth when they read the Holy Quran and what has been written about Islam and about him by the wise among their own people. This film will motivate them to read and find out, in sha Allah, and perhaps it will be the cause of many being saved from misguidance.

Eighthly:

The basic message of this film is to describe Islam as a terrorist and violent religion. But this is no more than a fabrication. Islam is the religion of mercy, justice and humanity. It is what saved the people of other religions from the injustice and wrongdoing of their rulers, as happened in Andalusia, Egypt and other countries in which people of other groups were badly mistreated, including the Jews.
Ima speechless!

Israel Wolfenson says: The minor losses incurred by the Jews in the Hijaz are insignificant in comparison with the benefits that the Jews gained with the emergence of Islam. The Muslim conquerors saved thousands of Jews who were spread throughout the lands of the Roman Empire, and who were faced with all kinds of persecution.

Islam is not a religion which accepts humiliation, and jihad for the sake of Allah is one of its main principles and one of the greatest of deeds in Islam. It is prescribed in order to protect the Muslims from their enemies, to convey the religion of Allah, and to spread the word of divine Oneness throughout the world.
The desert Arabs were the LAST to get the message of one God

Islam does not say that people must be forced to enter it, because one of the conditions of Islam is sincerity, and if there is no sincerity then one is a hypocrite among the ranks of Muslims, and Islam does not want this base characteristic among its followers. On the other hand, we find that priests and monks have played a part in forcing people to accept Christianity in Europe and elsewhere, and the numbers of people who were slain in pursuit of this aim is very great indeed; historians say that they are between 7 and 15 million!

Another obvious wrong is focusing on the mistakes of some Muslims who were denounced by Muslim scholars and leaders for killing innocent people and attributing that to Islam – as happens in some clips in the film about the bombs on the trains in London and Madrid and the like. All of that was denounced by Muslim scholars, even though these deeds were a reaction against wrongdoing and oppression. At the same time they ignore those who were slain in the First and Second World Wars in which tens of millions died – 14 million in WW1 and 55 million in WW2. Those wars were not between the Muslims and Christians, rather they were amongst themselves. They did not make any mention either of the people killed in Japan by the American Atomic bombs, or the “Red Indians” (Native Americans) killed by the Americans, or the Asian people also killed by the Americans, or those who were killed by colonialists and occupiers.

They ignore the destruction and terrorism wrought by the crusader attacks against Muslim lands; they ignore what America and its allies are doing today in Afghanistan and Iraq; what the Serbs did with the blessing of the priests in Bosnia; and much, much more. If there are things that history may forget about, it can never forget what the Inquisition did, especially in Spain.

Gustave le Bon says in his book Arab Civilization:

Ferdinand promised to give the Arabs freedom of religion and language, but in 1499 the persecution of the Arabs began, which lasted for centuries, and which did not end until the Arabs had been expelled from Spain. It started with forcing Arabs to be baptized, then the Inquisition ordered that many of those who had been baptised be burned on the grounds that they were not really Christians. This “purging by fire” continued slowly because it was not possible to burn millions of Arabs in one go.

The “pious” Cardinal of Toledo, who was the head of the Inquisition, advised cutting off the heads of all the Arabs who did not become Christian, men, women, old people and children. The Dominican monk Baleda did not think that this was sufficient, and advised that the Arabs who had become Christian should also be beheaded, as well as those who had remained Muslim. His reason for doing so was that it was impossible to know whether the faith of those Arabs who had become Christian was sincere, so it was preferable to kill all of the Arabs with the sword, so that God could judge between them in the afterlife, and send to Hell those whose Christianity was not sincere!
We can only admit that we cannot find such vicious conquerors who should be condemned for unlawful slaughter like that committed against the Muslims!

Anyone who thinks about it now will find that the terrorists are people of other religions, Christians, Jews, Hindus and Sikhs; he will find that the Muslims are the victims of this terror. When will the sleepers wake up?!  When with the heedless become aware?

We said to this lying MP who is calling us to rip the terrorist pages out of the Holy Quran – as he claims: Come and let us see what your Holy Bible says about terrorism:

If you are a Jew who believes in the Old Testament, then see what is attributed to the Lord, when He said to Moses in Deuteronomy 20:10, 16-17:

“When you march up to attack a city, make its people an offer of peace …

However, in the cities of the nations the LORD your God is giving you as an inheritance, do not leave alive anything that breathes. 17 completely destroy them—the Hittites, Amorites, Canaanites, Perizzites, Hivites and Jebusites—as the LORD your God has commanded you.”

If you are a Christian and want something from the New Testament, then here are some texts from it.

In Matthew 10:34-36, it is narrated that Jesus (peace be upon him) said:

“Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword.

35 For I have come to turn 'a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law

36 a man's enemies will be the members of his own household.”

Ninthly:

What the Muslims should do now is:

1. Not cause problems in their own countries, such as demonstrations in which property is destroyed or blood is shed.

2. Refer the matter to scholars and wise men to deal with it, or something similar.

3. Strive to adhere to Islam in word and deed, which means taking part in spreading Islam and annoying the kaafirs who hate Islam and the Muslims.

4. Call people to Allah with wisdom and knowledge, distribute translations of the meanings of the Quran and easy-to-read Islamic books, and seek the help of trustworthy Islamic organizations and trustworthy scholars in doing so.

And Allah is the Guide.

????????????????????????

Arrested for driving without a penis.

You drive, I whip: Saudi men warn women

New male campaign on Facebook warns women against driving carsPublished Monday, May 23, 2011

Saudi men threatened to use their head dresses as a whip to prevent women from driving cars as part of a new Facebook male campaign in response to another campaign by women.

A new Facebook page also threatened men against helping women in their campaign to drive cars, saying these the Iqal (headgear) would be waiting for these men. Women quickly hit back by threatening to use blade weapons to defend themselves.

Saudi newspapers said the men’s campaign launched on Facebook is dubbed “The June 17 Iqal campaign to prevent women from driving,” adding that it is in response to a women’s campaign launched on

Facebook and Twitter under the slogan “I will drive starting June 17,” which has gained massive female support.

Male (Not Men) campaigners urged support for their drive and said on the page:”attention is to prevent women from driving with all our strength…….the Iqal will be waiting for any woman or man supporting the campaign for women to drive cars.”

According to the reports, more than 11,500 women and men in Saudi Arabia have joined the female drive while around 1,400 have so far joined the men’s counter-campaign. “We warn women against adopting Western attitudes and concepts and against a large increase in road accidents in case women are allowed to drive cars,” the men’s site said. The warning was met by a similar threat from women, who said on the page that they could use “bladed weapons in case they are intercepted by any one while they are driving.”

The women’s June 17 drive follows growing calls to end a long-standing ban on driving cars by women in the conservative Gulf kingdom. Many women have already been reported to have defied the ban over the past few months.

On Saturday, Saudi police detained one of the leading women in the June 17 campaign for driving a car in the streets of a key city. But they set her free three hours later following a gathering by other women near the police centre in the eastern town of Khobar.

Police said they interrogated Manal Al Sharif after she was spotted by many people driving her car through the streets of Khobar. A Saudi newspaper carried a film showing Manal driving her car in Khobar as she wore black glasses and a black scarf. “Manal drove her car through Khobar streets in defiance of the kingdom’s social traditions which prevent women from driving,” 'Sharq' said.

Last week, another women defined the ban by driving her car for four days without being stopped. Najla Al Hariri, a housewife in her mid-30s, said she drove non-stop for four days in the streets of the Western Red Sea port of Jeddah "to defend her belief that Saudi women should be allowed to drive."

"I don't fear being arrested because I am setting an example that my daughter and her friends are proud of," Hariri said, adding she was offering driving lessons for women.

In addition to being banned from driving, Saudi women cannot travel abroad without authorization from their male guardians, and are also not allowed to vote in the municipal elections, the only public polls in the absolute monarchy. When in public, they are obliged to cover from head to toe.

Hariri ridiculed the social belief that Saudi women are treated "like queens" as they are driven around by their male relatives or drivers, saying "this is a big lie." "We are always under their mercy to give us a lift," she said.

Another female driver seized in Saudi
Published Tuesday, May 24, 2011

Saudi authorities seized a woman for breaking a ban on driving a car in the Gulf Kingdom, the second female driver to be arrested in just a few days, a newspaper reported on Tuesday.
The woman, in her 40s, was spotted driving a car in the central province of Al Ras, where she later parked the vehicle and went into a supermarket for shopping, Ajel said.
“When she returned to her car, police were waiting for her…they arrested her for breaking the rules while her mother and sister, who were with her, were allowed to go home.”
The unnamed woman was the second to be arrested for driving a car this week. On Saturday, police detained Manal Al Sharif for driving in the eastern town of Khobar. They released her three hours later but she was arrested again on Monday and jailed for five days.

Please go to Facebook page; Protecting Saudi females on 17th june
 and hit LIKE

Fridays Freaky Fatwa--Who really screws up Islam? Jews, Christians or Muslims

A Muslim asks a scholar

I’m a Muslim & I'm doing my best to follow the path of Islam. My question is about what if Muslim people like me, sees private part of women Accidently. Is it a Sin if a Muslim male accidently sees girl/women without any proper hijab while walking around shops, road, street or anywhere? I’m not trying to be rude or anything, I’m trying lower my gaze & not to look at any girl, but I really can’t help it & I get frustrated if I did a bad sin. So, I just wanted to know if it’s a Sin if Muslim person accidently sees/saw a girl without any proper hijab.

And the scholar replied

Praise be to Allah 

Where do you live? We would like to come visit the lands where the private parts of a woman can be seen everywhere. 
Well, you know that’s what they’re thinking.  Here is how they replied…

The Messenger of Allah said: “O Ali, do not follow one glance with another, for you may be allowed the first but not the second.”

Based on this, we advise you to try to lower your gaze as much as you can and to seek the help of Allah in doing that. One of the greatest means prescribed in Islam that will help you to lower your gaze is to get married, as advised by the Prophet.
And he got married over a dozen times.  That joke wrote itself.
Seriously dude, get a grip.

A Muslim asks a scholar

I have a Question to ask concerning Jesus (peace be upon him). Did Jesus (peace be upon him) was ascended twice to Allah? cause i have read in some books that it mentions Jesus (peace be upon him) ascending to the skies and them later was brought down to comfort his mother and tell the jews of something and then he left. is this true?

And the scholar replies

Praise be to Allah.

Allah, may He be glorified and exalted, tells us that Jesus (upon whom be peace) was raised up to heaven just one time, in the verse (interpretation of the meaning):

4:158 “But Allah raised him up unto Himself…” and Allah does not tell us that Jesus was sent back to this earth. So those who claim that Jesus was sent back to this earth have to bring us evidence and proof. If they cannot do that – and they will never be able to do it – then their argument has no basis.
The scholar obviously hasn’t read the Gospels- which the Quran confirms.  There are many stories that are not written in the Quran, probably because, as the Quran says, it had to be simple so the desert Arabs would understand it.  Plus it was written in poetic form so it would be easier to memorize.  The Quran does not say that Jesus didn’t come back, it just makes the point that Jesus was unlike any other prophet.  As he continues…

Allah says (interpretation of the meaning):

3:55 “And when Allah said: ‘O Jesus! I will take you and raise you to Myself and clear you of those who disbelieve, and I will make those who follow you superior to those who disbelieve till the Day of Resurrection. Then you will return to Me and I will judge between you in the matters in which you used to dispute.”
This is saying that Jesus is superior to all others.

Ibn Jareer, explained that the word “raise” – refers to his being taken up, but most of the scholars said that the meaning here is sleep,
See?  Already starting with the mischief?  There is an Arabic word for resurrection and it’s not the same word as sleep.

If your scholars lie to you and you take their word, what religion are you following?

as Allah says elsewhere in the Quran (interpretation of the meaning):

6:60 “It is He, Who takes your souls by night (when you are asleep)…”
39:42 “It is Allah Who takes away the souls at the time of their death, and those that die not during their sleep…”
Right.  This is what happened to Muhammad as well as all other humans who believe.  It has nothing to do with Jesus.

Allah’s statement that He raised Jesus up to heaven is also a refutation of the Jews’ claim to have killed him. Allah, may He be glorified and exalted, says (interpretation of the meaning):
Before you read the verse I want to point something out.  This/these scholars twist their “interpretation of the meaning” to encourage hate, mistrust, death and all things bad and that really pisses me off.   And while they and their apologist will say that Christians, Jews, Atheists and Pagans take the Quran out of context, it is these scholars who have led the way.  Check it out…

4:155 “Because of their breaking the covenant, and of their rejecting the signs of Allah, and of their killing the Prophets unjustly, and of their saying, ‘Our hearts are wrapped nay, Allah has set a seal upon their hearts because of their disbelief, so they believe not but a little.
Have any of you ever met a Jew who killed a prophet? 
Is there anyone who believes the Jews killed Jesus? 
This is just a story, a story about people who have been dead for thousands of years, now it is a foundation for hate and a law in the path to a watering hole.  For those of you who only speak Arabic, the translation of that is Sharia.

To demonstrate how these scholars twist the verses to accomplish hate, here are the verses that come before the one they used.
4:152 But those who believe in Allah and His messengers and make no distinction between any of them, unto them Allah will give their wages; and Allah was ever Forgiving, Merciful
Hey!  If the verse they used is a law for the path to a watering hole, then shouldn’t this one be a law, too? 4:153 The People of the Scripture ask of thee that thou shouldst cause an (actual) Book to descend upon them from heaven. They asked a greater thing of Moses aforetime, for they said: Show us God plainly. The storm of lightning seized them for their wickedness. Then they chose the calf for worship after clear proofs had come unto them. And We forgave them that! And We bestowed on Moses evident authority
Now, if Allah can get over past mistakes (sins) so should everyone who believes in one God.  Add forgiveness to the path to a watering hole.
4:154 And We caused the Mount to tower above them at the taking of their covenant: and We bade them: Enter the gate, prostrate! and we bade them: Transgress not the Sabbath! and We took from them a firm covenant
All good Jews honour the Sabbath.  And the Covent says Israel belongs to the Jews and the Quran agrees.  I don’t believe many believers have read the Quran because they were surprised when I wrote about it.  If you want to read it, go to the top left and type Jews or Israel.  If they really believe in the Quran then they’d honour the Jews right to Israel.  And if you debate with religious radicals who believe otherwise, you can quote their own text to them.
And the mischief maker continues…

And because of their (Jews’) disbelief and uttering against Mary a grave false charge (that she had committed illegal sexual intercourse);
If you’ve never heard this it’s because you’re not a new Christian traveling through the 7^th century Arab desert.  They were telling some strange tales, like the following.

4:157 And because of their saying: We slew the Messiah Jesus son of Mary, Allah's messenger They slew him not nor crucified, but it appeared so unto them; and lo! those who disagree concerning it are in doubt thereof; they have no knowledge thereof save pursuit of a conjecture ; they slew him not for certain
The Jews did not say they killed Jesus.  But in the Arab desert this was the story that was going around.  Also, the words crucify or crucified are not in the Arab version, that was added later.  And you have to look to next verse to get the real understanding
4:158  But Allah took him up unto Himself. Allah was ever Mighty, wise
That is another verse that shows Jesus was more than just human, that he did not die in the sense of 7^th century Arab die, and he wasn’t sleeping, he went back to where he came from—God.  This was never meant to be the story of Jesus, it was meant to correct what was being said about him by the 7^th century desert Arabs.  Geez, if people would only get that, we could change the conversation.

4:159  Yet there is not one of the followers of earlier revelation who does not, at the moment of his death, grasp the truth about Jesus; and on the Day of Resurrection he [himself] shall bear witness to the truth against them.
It’s not Muhammad who will judge, it will be Jesus, the Gospel says the same.
As they continue…..this is interesting

Jesus (peace be upon him) has not died yet; Allah raised him up unto Himself because the Jews wanted to kill him, and he will descend again at the end of time and rule the earth. He will live for as long as Allah wants him to, then he will die and the believers will pray for him.
They’re still desperate to believe the Jews killed Jesus.  Well they were the last to get the message of one God; I guess some will be the last to actually read a history book.

Ibn Katheer said:

When Allah took the Messiah (peace be upon him) up into heaven, his followers split into different groups. Some of them believed in what Allah had sent him with, some of them exaggerated about him and made him the son of God, and others said that he was God, or that he was the third of three (trinity).

It was at the time of Constantine that pork was permitted and they began to pray towards the East; they made images in their churches, shrines and monasteries, and added ten days to their fasting because of a sin that he had committed, as they claim.

The religion of the Messiah became the religion of Constantine. He built more than twelve thousand churches, shrines and monasteries for them, and the city that bore his name [Constantinople – now Istanbul]. A sect of Christians followed him and they prevailed over the Jews with the help of Allah, because they were closer to the truth….’

Sheikh Muhammed Salih Al-Munajjid

And Allah knows best.
Now the same could be said about Muhammad and his Hadith.  They add things, remove things, forbid what Allah has not, and make Muhammad the head messenger.  They believe follow means imitate, seal means last and that a woman’s hair is a genital.  Very, very few have read the other scriptures even though the Quran tells them their scriptures (the Torah and Gospels) are important.

The correct answer to his question should have been, if you want to know about Jesus then read the Gospels. 
If you want proof that Israel belongs to the Jews then read the Quran…or my blogs :D

And if I sound cranky it’s because bin laden arrived last week.

A Muslim asks a scholar

Can the Muslims live in peace in Palestine?  Please do correct me if I don't have my facts right:
According to The Bible there is no country such as Israel, only Palestine. The Jew and the Arab, both stemming from Abraham is in fact half brothers. So why can they not live in harmony in a new country called Palestine?

And the scholar replies

Praise be to Allah.

Your question may be answered by the following points:

There is no doubt that the Prophet Abraham was a pure monotheist, and he was not among the polytheists and disbelievers. Although the Jews are among the offspring they went against his way by associating partners in worship with Allah and claiming that ‘Uzayr (Ezra) was a “son of God.” They said that God is miserly and that His hand is “tied up”, and they said, “He is poor and we are rich.” They also said that when God created the heavens and the earth in six days, He got tired, so He rested on the Sabbath day – exalted be Allah far above all that they say about Him. They also likened the attributes of God to human attributes (anthropomorphism) and killed the Prophets, etc., etc.
IF there is anyone who believes that Ezra was the son of God would you please speak up!  This is not in the Torah.  Just like the stories of the Jesus that weren’t true, there were some Jews of that time who did believe that Ezra was the son of G-d.  The Quran is just correcting that story.

Once this distinction and contrast is made clear, there can be no brotherhood between a monotheistic believer and a polytheistic disbeliever, as Allah says in the Quran (interpretation of the meaning):
60:4,6 “Indeed there has been an excellent example for you in Ibraaheem and those with him, when they said to their people, ‘Verily, we are free from you and whatever you worship besides God. We have rejected you, and there has started between us and you, hostility and hatred forever, - until you believe in God Alone,’ – except the saying of Ibraaheem to his father: ‘Verily, I will ask for forgiveness for you, but I have no power to do anything for you before God.’ Our Lord! In You (Alone) we put our trust, and to You (Alone) we turn in repentance, and to You (Alone) is (our) final Return, - … Certainly, there has been in them an excellent example for you to follow, - for those who look forward to (the Meeting with) God – (for the reward from Him) and the Last Day. And whosoever turn away, then verily, God is Rich (Free of all wants), Worthy of all Praise.”
The Palestinians should memorize this verse.

Once this separation and enmity is clear, it is unavoidable that there will be hostility and disavowal and the resulting struggle against the enemies of Allah. So long as the laws and wisdom of Allah dictate that there should the distinction between believers and disbelievers, there has to be this clearly-stated enmity. There can be no change to the laws of Allah.
Allah is an Arabic word for God.  The scholars know this but prefer to have war not peace and if you follow them, what religion are you following?

There cannot be harmony between Jews – who are usurpers and aggressors, who have oppressed and persecuted others, and who are known for their treachery and corruption throughout the world, historically and in the present age – and the purely monotheistic Muslim owners of the land, whose menfolk the Jews have killed, and imprisoned their sons, and destroyed their homes, and taken possession of their lands by force, and prevented them from earning a proper living, and carried out chemical and radiational experiments on their prisoners, and taken organs from them for transplant into Jewish patients… and all other kinds of persecutions and atrocities.
Yeah right.  If they really believe this crap why don’t we just say, Allah’s will, that nothing happens without the will of Allah, that the Quran speaks of destiny,  It doesn’t sound like these scholars believe in the Quran.

In addition to this, the Jews are people of treachery and betrayal; it is not possible to trust them at all. Their current conduct bears this out: is there any treaty or agreement signed by them that they have actually fulfilled? This is no big surprise for the Muslims, who know what Allah has said in His Book about the Jews (interpretation of the meaning):
2:100 “Is it not (the case) that every time they make a covenant, some party among them throws it aside? Nay! The truth is most of them believe not.”
Note the words, ‘some party among them’.  Not all of them.  The Quran is only speaking to the partiers.  But as you can see, there is no desire for peace.

Moreover, if the believers agreed to live in peace with the Jews, who would be in charge?  One of the basic principles of submitting to one god is that it should prevail, not be prevailed over. One of the conditions for People of the Book (Jews and Christians) living with believers in a believing country is that they should live under certain conditions (shuroot ahl al-dhimmah) in return for the security and protection afforded them by the believers. One of the most important of these conditions is that they should not openly display their shirk and kufr (polytheistic disbelief) in the believers lands, whether by word or deed.
Oh so totally stupid and wrong!  They take lots of money from the the Christians and Jews!  It's also where they get their education. They come to the lands of the Christians and Jews because scholars and those who follow them have screwed up their countries.
And yes I did translate the Arabic words to English.

The rest of it I left as it was written.

As the Muslims and Jews are enemies residing in opposing religious and doctrinal camps, it is not possible for them to be brought together unless one is made to submit to the other by force. Indeed, the Jews now are not allowing the Muslims to remain in their homes, even if there was no provocative action on the part of the Muslims; they are seizing the Muslims’ property by force, building their settlements on the Muslims’ lands and expelling the Muslims by any means. They have expelled millions to the neighbouring countries, which have accommodated them in the so-called Palestinian refugee camps.

Finally, although the Muslims nowadays are in a position of weakness and humiliation – because they have turned away from their religion – and are unable to fight the Jews, take back their stolen lands and impose the rule of Islamic sharee’ah in Palestine, this does not mean that this will always be the case until the end of the world. Things have to change, and one of the indications of this is the hadeeth of the Prophet, who informed us of some things that are to happen in the future. He was supported by Revelation from his Lord; he did not speak of his own whims and desires, but of that which was revealed to him. He said:

Bukhari “You will fight the Jews and will prevail over them, so that a rock will say, ‘O Muslim! There is Jew behind me, kill him!’”
Translation.  The Muslims will only win when they hear rocks talking to them.

We would like to express our appreciation for your question, your desire to find out the truth, and the polite and eloquent manner in which your inquiry was phrased.
Sheikh Muhammed Salih Al-Munajjid
They should add, and we are sorry that we had to tell all those lies to make our version of this religion violent, intolerant and wrong.  But if people don’t fear us, we won’t have a job.

I've heard that many Christians hate islam and will not even touch the Quran because they say it is filled with evil.  Can't really blame them when you read what these scholars say, but I say this to Christians, you'd fight a better fight if you would use their own texts to defend your beliefs.  And here's something very interesting, I also have many Jewish friends and I've not yet heard any of them hate anyone.
To the believers who insist on calling themselves by the Arabic word muslim, if you read the Quran yourselves instead of listening to the Jinn who are disguised as scholars- you would support Israel for the Jews, as that is what G-d has ordained.  And if you'd quit making hadith equal to the Quran maybe your countries would prosper and know peace. 
The desert Arabs were the last to receive the message of one God and that God is the same God of the Christians and the Jews....and the Sabeans but I can't find any of them, but if I could, I would say you believe in their God, also.  The 'traditions' do not need to be the same but the one major message is that you all believe in one G-d.  Imagine this, if aliens were to arrive tomorrow and ask the world; who here believes in one God?', you'd all raise your hands.