01 02 13

Hellfire...it's getting crowded

I'm glad I don't have to feed the Christians. They have been competing hard with the Islamists but they don't get fed in their hellfire.

It's almost like there is a virus going all around the world at once. It mostly affects the god guys and it always centers around controlling the use of a vagina...something they don't have and sex, something I doubt any of them are getting.

In the land of the free, USA, there are suddenly many extreme Christian politians in office and they have decided that there is not enough religion in government so they cherry picked their Bible to find laws that back up their position. Many believe that women are no longer smart enough to make all of their own decisions and they shouldn't get equal pay. I believe they were using Timothy as a foundation, that women are not to teach men but as with all god guys, they extended that to mean women should not make the same amount of money as a man. One decided that abortion, for example, should be forbidden even in the case of incest because....'sometimes it's voluntary'. I believe he was referencing the story of Lott in the Bible. Or that rape is just another form of conception. Lot of raping in the Bible.

Gays are also a target as that is the second group of people that religious radicals like to torture. There are over 200 laws of Leviticus in the Bible, but the one about homosexuals is the one law they land on. They don't shut down Red Lobster restaurants even though shellfish is forbidden and most all of them eat pork. But unlike some Muslim countries, they don't kill gays as it's not worth going to prison for following the religious law. And Muslim countries should not kill gays as that's Biblical law and not Quran law.

The problem with electing religious men into political office is they want to impose the religious laws on you based on their own weakness. And there will always be someone even more religious with bigger weaknesses than the last one and if you keep electing them, pretty soon you'll have a country where everyone is miserable.

If your religious beliefs are centered around preventing others from going to the hellfire, you're doing it wrong. Your only job is to prevent yourself from going there, everyone else has FREE WILL.

If your life isn't going right, fix your life, don't be trying to fix someone else's life. And if your life is going right, don't mess up someone else's life, be thankful- not self righteous.

Peace...one person at a time minding their own business


14 15
01 02 13

Making a fool out of Muhammad with blasphemy laws

To the Muslims who do not know this, and to reduce my output for bitter fruit, you need to be told that...Muhammad is only mentioned 4 times by name in the Quran.  Only 4 times.  And not one of those times does Muhammad say you can act the fool if his name is blasphemed. 
The Quran does not allow you to act the fool on any occasion. 
The Quran does not have a blasphemy law.
Now if you want to belong to a religion that allows that kind of behavior covert, but quit pretending you believe in the Quran when you follow hadith!
This is what the Quran says about Muhammad.
Right at the start it tells you;
3:144  Muhammad  is no more than an apostle: many Were the apostle that passed away before him. If he died or were slain, will ye then Turn back on your heels? If any did turn back on his heels, not the least harm will he do to Allah. but Allah will swiftly reward those who with gratitude
See?  It says shut the hellfire up.

33:40 Muhammad is not the father of any of your men, but the Messenger of Allah, and the Seal of the Prophets: and Allah has full knowledge of all things
So it won’t matter if you try and hide your face with a scarf as you create mischief, you’re still screwed.

47:2 But those who believe and work deeds of righteousness, and believe in the Revelation sent down to Muhammad - for it is the Truth from their Lord,
How righteous is it to have most of the world thinking you have no self control and no reading skills?
48:29 Muhammad is the apostle of Allah. and those who are with him are strong against Unbelievers (idol worshippers and pagans), but compassionate amongst each other. Thou wilt see them bow and prostrate themselves (in prayer), seeking Grace from Allah and Good Pleasure. On their faces are their marks, the traces of their prostration. This is their similitude in the Torah; and their similitude in the Gospel is: like a seed which sends forth its blade, then makes it strong; it then becomes thick, and it stands on its own stem, the sowers with wonder and delight. As a result, it fills the Unbelievers with rage at them. Allah has promised those among them who believe and do righteous deeds forgiveness, and a great Reward.
Your blade is not strong and your faith is weak, it collapses with mere words which triggers your sudden jihad syndrome. 
Your struggle should be education- not violence. 
And you’re not fooling anyone.  You actually believe you are a mini Muhammad?  It’s not Muhammad who is insulted it is you that feels insulted, Muhammad is not upset. 
Yes, life might be horrible but making it worse won’t make anyone better.  You want to do something for Muhammad?  Teach someone to read.

And as a reminder, or for those who haven't actually read the Quran, I leave you with words of wisdom

17:53 And tell my servants that they should speak in a most kindly manner unto those who do not share their beliefs. Verily, Satan is always ready to stir up discord between men; for verily; Satan is mans foe.
2:285 The messenger believeth in that which hath been revealed unto him from his Lord and (so do) the believers.  Each one believeth in Allah and His angels and His scriptures and His messengers--We make no distinction between any of His messengers--and they say:  We hear, and we obey. (Grant us) Thy forgiveness, our Lord. Unto Thee is the journeying.
Well, if the messenger believed it, why don’t Muslims? Many won’t even read the previous scriptures and, every prayer starts with; there is only one God and Muhammad was his messenger.  This is shirk.

64:12 obey Allah and obey His messenger; but if ye turn away, then the duty of Our messenger is only to convey the message plainly.
Muhammad’s job was to convey the message, not force people into believing it.  The message was the Quran, not how he ate or slept.  You are making a fool out of Muhammad.
And here's the kicker...and no one is going to like what I'm about to write, not Christians and not Muslims...
The Quran was supposed to be an upgrade to the previous books, the Torah and the Gospels. When God looked down at the desert Arabs God said they were the worst of the worst and most in need of the message (and this was after looking at the whole damn planet!) so, for some reason God thought the worst of the worst could handle New Rules
Old rules first, the Bible does not allow women to inherit. It allows for the killing of blasphemers, apostates, witches, gays, adulterers, rebelious kids, those who work on the Sabath, free speech and free thought. A woman had to marry her rapists, in some situations when she became widowed she had to marry her brother in law, the kids always belonged to the father as they were his property just as she was. She had to be obediant to her husband or he could abuse her. These are just a few.
New rules....dump all of the above.
But what do we see? We see way too many Muslims following biblical laws. Maybe they weren't ready for an upgrade. The USA was as it decided, no compulsion in religion, women can make their own decisions, free speech and free thought, no random killings and all people are created equal.
The best part of all this is, the quran actually says if you follow the right law (path) you will prosper. I rest my case
How much further ahead would Muslim countries be if they had stuck to the message...the New Rules?

This is why Muhammad is on the Supreme Court Building of the USA

14 15
01 02 13

I charge the King of Saudi Arabia with Apostasy and Blasphemy!

Another twitter user has been charged with insulting Islam.  An Arab man in Saudi Arabia is accused of offending Islam and its Prophet Mohammed in remarks on his Twitter page, the second man to be charged with apostasy in the Gulf Kingdom.  His name is Muhammad Salama.

I charge the King of Saudi Arabia with blasphemy, apostasy and hypocrisy for not believing in the Quran, but choosing to follow the ancient laws of the Christians and Jews.

The paper, which carried part of Salama’s remarks, said he claimed the Prophet (pbuh) had once tried to commit a suicide because he doubted the Koran.’
Well, based on the same hadiths used by the King to enforce the blasphemy and apostasy laws (they are also used to justify killing gays, stoning adulterers and denying women their rights) the comment Salma made is true.  Muhammad, the Prophet, was suicidal more than once.  After his first meeting with the angle, he ran home to his wife for protection.  He was scared and he wanted to die.  Based on Hadith, Salma spoke the truth.

Salma is said to have tweeted; “If God gives chances but does not forget, then why He forgot Israel and did not give chances to Gaddafi.”  The Hadith tell followers to remain stupid while the Quran urges one to gain knowledge so why is the King encouraging stupidity over knowledge?  I find this to be a fair question, one that deservers discussion, not the death penalty.

The paper also said Salama believed that God “will let us enjoy liquor, usury and sorcery in Paradise after we were deprived of them in life.”  Based on the Quran, this is mostly true.  While the Quran does not go into everything that will be available in paradise it does imply that what is denied on earth will be allowed in paradise…though I have no idea why one would need a loan in paradise or need to use sorcery.  But this cannot be logically seen as an insult.

The King has forbid what God has not and when he is challenged to bring forth a sura like it, he brings Hadith.  This makes the King a disbeliever in its truest form.  Why does he insist that his people follow the laws of the ancient Jews and Christians?  Why does he not boast that the Quran is the only book that does not allow the killings for apostasy and blasphemy?  Why is he not proud of that?  It’s almost like he’s ashamed of the Quran and too embarrassed to follow its teachings.

The Quran says that one cannot be a disbeliever until they have read the Quran and then rejected it.  Isn’t this exactly what the King has done?  It also says that the desert Arabs were the worst of the worst when it comes to hypocrisy.  I ask, has anything changed?

The Quran also says that Muhammad is not your father that his only job was to deliver the Quran and if you don’t believe it then there is no harm on Muhammad, so how can he be insulted?

The Quran also says not to put one prophet above another so why does the King not believe that?

I say, if the King would rather believe in the laws of the ancient Jews and Christians, then he should convert to their religion and leave those who would rather follow the Quran to the real believers.

The King of Saudi Arabia does not believe in the Quran, he believes in Hadith and will be tasting the bitter fruit of the Az Zaqqum.  The people of Saudi Arabia need to stand up against his injustice or they too, will be feeding from the bitter Tree.

And because the King loves Hadith he should follow the Hadith of blasphemy and apostasy and kill himself…as the Hadith dictates.

Muhammad Salama has done nothing wrong.  Asking questions and seeking knowledge is encouraged by the Quran!

Also, if you use BING as a search engine and type in the word ‘blasphemy’ then click images, images of Christians appear.  I say it should include images of the King!
14 15
01 02 13

Sharia on Saturday--Blasphemy!

Recently a young man tweeted….and now Saudi Arabia wants him dead for the crime of blasphemy.  How can Saudi Arabia claim a law that they stole from pagans?  Maybe they should rename their country, Silly Arabia, land of man gods.

An Arab proverb says: “Kill me, but do not mock my faith.”
I’d have to ask, and which faith would that be?

The truth is, the Quran does not say to kill anyone for blasphemy.  In fact, the Quran only uses the word a dozen times or so and not once does it say for anyone to kill a blasphemer.  That is left up to God.

3:55 Behold! God said: "O Jesus! I will take thee and raise thee to Myself and clear thee (of the falsehoods) of those who blaspheme; I will make those who follow thee superior to those who reject faith, to the Day of Resurrection: Then shall ye all return unto me, and I will judge between you of the matters wherein ye dispute

5:68 Say: "O People of the Book! ye have no ground to stand upon unless ye stand fast by the Law, the Gospel, and all the revelation that has come to you from your Lord." It is the revelation that cometh to thee from thy Lord, that increaseth in most of them their obstinate rebellion and blasphemy. But sorrow thou not over (these) people without Faith

40:42  "Ye do call upon me to blaspheme against God, and to join with Him partners of whom I have no knowledge; and I call you to the Exalted in Power, Who forgives again and again
Yep, God deals with those who blaspheme, not humans, and certainly not humans pretending to be god.

And you won’t even find the words blasphemy or blaspheme in the Hadith. So if it’s not in the Quran or hadith, where did the blasphemy laws come from?

In Athens blasphemy was a crime.  Making fun of Ceres (a goddess of farmers, fertility and Moms) or Proserpine (another female goddess of springtime) could cause you a world of grief.
So they are following pagan laws!

‘In A.D. 538, the time of Justinian, the people are called upon to abstain from blasphemy, which provokes God to anger so they had to be killed.’
Or are they following ancient Byzantine laws?

‘Among the Franks, (A.D. 818), blasphemy was a capital offence and you would be killed.’
Do you think they are following these old laws?  We know they aren’t following the Quran.

Leviticus 24:10-16 10And the son of an Israelite woman, whose father was an Egyptian, went out among the children of Israel; and this son of the Israelite woman and a man of Israel strove together in the camp. And the Israelite woman's son blasphemed the name of the LORD and cursed. And they brought him unto Moses (his mother's name was Shelomith, the daughter of Dibri, of the tribe of Dan); and they put him under guard, that the mind of the LORD might be shown them.  And the LORD spoke unto Moses, saying, "Bring forth him that hath cursed outside the camp; and let all who heard him lay their hands upon his head, and let all the congregation stone him.  And thou shalt speak unto the children of Israel, saying, `Whosoever curseth his God shall bear his sin. 16And he that blasphemeth the name of the LORD, he shall surely be put to death, and all the congregation shall certainly stone him. As well the stranger as he that is born in the land, when he blasphemeth the name of the LORD, shall be put to death.
Now isn’t that interesting?  The mullahs and clerics who demand death for those they claim have blasphemed are not following the Quran, they’re following the Torah.  They’re Jews!

Thomas Aquinas says that “it is clear that blasphemy, which is a sin committed directly against God, is graver than murder, which is a sin against one's neighbor.
So they’re Christians!

Isa. 52:5; "And now what do I have here?" declares the LORD. "For my people have been taken away for nothing, and those who rule them mock," declares the LORD. "And all day long my name is constantly blasphemed.
I kinda think that’s funny.

Btw, Jesus was also accused of blasphemy.

Rev. 13:1, Then I saw a beast rising up out of the sea. It had seven heads and ten horns, with ten crowns on its horns. And written on each head were names that blasphemed God. The beast was given a mouth to utter proud words and blasphemies and to exercise its authority for forty-two months opened its mouth to blaspheme God, and to slander his name and his dwelling place and those who live in heaven. Then the angel carried me away in the Spirit into a wilderness. There I saw a woman sitting on a scarlet beast that was covered with blasphemous names and had seven heads and ten horns.
Well, you knew there had to be a female in there with the blasphemers.

The persecution of pagans, Jews, Muslims and dissident Christians began in the early middle ages.  The Inquisition was one of the most powerful and scary institutions in Europe.  Victims were tortured for their confessions.
Are the king and his scholars imitating the Catholics?

‘In 1656, James Nayler, was found guilty for claiming equality with God. He was repeatedly set in the pillory and scourged; branded on the forehead with the letter ‘B’; had his tongue bored with a iron and was confined afterwards in prison and set to hard labour’
In England and in colonial America it was thought that a denial of Christianity could shake the foundation of society.
Or are they imitating the Protestants?  These are all considered to be People of the Book.

Salmaan Taseer was the Governor of Punjab, Pakistan.  He was killed in part because of his fight against the blasphemy laws.  This was a major blow to the Pakistan People’s Party who would like to move out of the dark ages and into the 21 century.  I hope they continue to fight their oppressors, freedom isn’t free but it’s worth the fight.  The west had to fight religious laws; too, it’s how the west was won.

And now we have Hamza Kashgari was a poet and a writer from Saudi Arabia.  On Muhammad’s birthday he tweeted a poem (sort of)

On your birthday, I will say that I have loved the rebel in you, that you've always been a source of inspiration to me, and that I do not like the halos of divinity around you. I shall not pray for you.

On your birthday, I find you wherever I turn. I will say that I have loved aspects of you, hated others, and could not understand many more.

On your birthday, I shall not bow to you. I shall not kiss your hand. Rather, I shall shake it as equals do, and smile at you as you smile at me. I shall speak to you as a friend, no more.
Muhammad would not have been mad at this at all as he knew he was just a messenger, that his only job was to deliver the message and if they believed the message, that was good, but if they didn’t believe the message, that was ok, too, and that he was no one’s father, and he knew he was not above any other messenger.  And he knew all that because it was part of the message he brought.  There is only one God and that God has no partners.  This king, his scholars and mullahs believe in a god who has partners.  They are God’s partners.

It was King Abdullah who ordered that Kashgari be arrested "for crossing red lines and denigrating religious beliefs in God and His Prophet."
Blasphemy!  He might have the authority to make up laws for his people, but he does not have the right to make up laws for God.

‘Kashgari described his intentions in terms of human rights: "I view my actions as part of a process toward freedom. I was demanding my right to practice the most basic human rights—freedom of expression and thought—so nothing was done in vain. I believe I'm just a scapegoat for a larger conflict. There are a lot of people like me in Saudi Arabia who are fighting for their rights."
And they have to start by challenging religious laws that were invented for pagans and the People of the Book. 

How can the final message be the same as the message for pagans?

Kashgari described the status of women's rights in Saudi Arabia by stating that Saudi women "won't go to hell 'because it's impossible to go there twice”
Brilliant remark!  So many pagan laws that need to be dumped.

Muhammad Afiq Muhammad Noor is his lawyer, and with a name like Muhammad, he had better know his Quran because that is his best defence.  I wish I could be there to assist him.

On the bright side, several contemporary Muslim scholars, including influential Islamic reformers, are speaking out in rejection of the blasphemy law, arguing for religious freedom.
This is their jihad.  They are compelled to fight oppression, even if it’s against their own brothers, so says the Quran. 

The king cannot say that this blasphemy law is Islamic because it is not.  The king will need to admit that this law is from the People of the Book…and the dreaded pagans. 
They way I see it; it is the King who has committed blasphemy.  But that doesn’t mean he should be killed, it does mean that he is not a good Muslim.

Afghanistan, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia still have the death penalty for blasphemy.  If 3rd world countries want to become 1st world countries, they’re going to have to knock this shit off.

And here’s the kicker.  You would think the King of Saudi Arabia would be bragging that his religion is the only religion that doesn’t demand death for blasphemy.  That should be a good thing!  The Quran is also the only God book that doesn’t demand death for apostasy.  Nor does it allow the stoning of adulterers or the killing of unbelievers.  So where is his pride?  Why does the King of Saudi Arabia insist on following the religious laws of the People of the Book and pagans?...and go unchallenged?  Is he ashamed of his religion?  I think he is.  Yes, he wears pretty dresses but what does that have to do with his religion?  Nothing.  He is lying to his people and he rules as an oppressor, by his own law he should kill himself.
And I find it odd and wrong that he follows every religion except his own.

I have so much fruit to make…..

Other sharia laws covered....

No building can be taller than a mosque

Honor killing...the facts

Stoning laws

Apostasy law

The ever so popular--Taqiyya and Kitman



14 15