01 02 13

I have to dislike you..because I love God

Egypt, Afghanistan, Pakistan and USA are countries that decide women's rights based on religious views. Women in these countries constantly have to fight for the right to make all of their own decisions, to be equal to a man, to employ Free Will. Other countries, especially developed countries allow women to make ALL of their own decisions.

It makes me wonder who America is competing with, free countries or countries they are fighting. I also wonder what good is a constitution if the words mean nothing. Are all people treated equally under the law? Or can religious beliefs (not facts) be used to alter a constitution to please a god? And do these religious folk really believe in Free Will?

In the US, the religious right won the election by huge numbers and now they will rule by faith, not law. And like other religiously ruled countries, the question of Free Will vs preventing people from going to the hellfire, will be challenged. Should gays be treated equally under the law? How about women? Will the US change from Land of the Free to Home of the scared?

The first rights to be challenged will be on women. Will the US decide that government has the right to use force to get women to comply with religious beliefs? And is that the biggest issue facing the USA today? Seems it is. I have to wonder if, like in Iran, the US believes that controlling sexual behaviour in certain people will please their gods and prevent earthquakes and other natural disasters.
I read this just now on my news feed from facebook.

"At the top of the agenda: legislation that would ban abortions at 20 weeks of pregnancy or later, pushing the legal boundaries set by the Supreme Court’s Roe v. Wade decision. Activists on both sides of the debate are gearing up for a fight that will demonstrate the consequences of Republican gains in the 2014 election.

“Unfortunately there has been gridlock on the abortion issue in Washington,” said Penny Nance, president of Concerned Women for America, a religious conservative group.

"Only 1.3% of abortions occur after 21 weeks, the benchmark used by the federal agency that tracks the procedure. But abortion-rights advocates argue that the women affected are particularly vulnerable, facing personal health risks or carrying severely disabled babies. Ultrasound exams, which can reveal previously undetected abnormalities, are typically done at 20 weeks.

"A 20-week ban “might sound like a good idea, but once people understand the real-life impact on women and their medical care, that’s where folks turn,”

"This bill is a direct challenge to Roe v. Wade and shows contempt for women’s health and rights, the role doctors play in their patients’ health care decisions, and the Constitution,”
"State legislatures approved 231 abortion-related regulations in the past four years, compared with 189 in the entire decade between 2000 and 2010, according to the Guttmacher Institute, a women’s health-policy organization."

I've had many debates with religious folk who put all the blame on single mothers  who need gov asst. to take care of their kids. They are called names, like 'welfare queens, losers, lazy, sluts'. These same religious folk don't want to help these mothers or their kids because they aren't worth anything. They shouldn't have been born...but now they want to force births. It's almost like they want/need to produce people to disdain...to show their god how pious they are.

Never once do these religious folk, in any of these religious countries, put any responsibility  on the men folk. It's never his fault that she had sex with him. He's entitled to have sex with weak women, so that makes it her fault. His sperm isn't his responsibility, it's hers. No laws about how many families he can create, doesn't matter if he can afford all the kids he makes, that's what gov is for. He's doing his godly duty, his seed is to be respected. But not the mother or the children.

These religious issues causes poverty. It creates nothing good.

You can't be free under religious law. You can't even use the religious belief of Free Will if you don't allow Free Will in the first place. It is the sole duty of religious folk to prevent everyone (but themselves) from going to the hellfire. To use religion as a weapon on others, but never on themselves.

The biggest hypocrisy that I find; most believe that their god knows what their humans will do before they do it. If that's true, aren't religious folk interfering with their god's will?
I say you are.

Why not put your efforts into education, sciences, building and repairing...and helping others? Is charity more important than force? Is love more important than disdain? Are humans  more important than religious beliefs?
And mostly, does your god really want you to make others miserable?
14 15
01 02 13

The Fathers of Daughters

Somewhere in the history of humans, fathers decided it would be ok if other males abused and harassed their daughters, it's on the news everyday. Without daughters, you can't have sons. Damaged daughters do not make good wives. You can't say it's always been that way. Never read a story where Adam abused or harassed Eve, not when they were totally naked or mostly naked.

Critters do not abuse their females in the maner that the males of humans do, it's not natural. Critters would be surprised that male humans find fault with females acting female. Critters are not interested in porn and they don't beat up their females if another critter pays attention to her. Seems it is safer to be a female critter than it does to be a female human. It's all about the sex.

© Noor Khamis/Reuters
Nearly 1,000 Kenyans protested in the streets of Nairobi on Monday, condemning the public assaults of several Kenyan women supposedly for wearing provocative clothing.
The latest assault occurred last week, when a woman was stripped naked at a bus stop by a group of men who accused her of "tempting" men. The assault was captured on video and posted online, catching the attention of women's groups and prompting Kenyans to protest.
"As African women, we are taught how to be silent," says Caroline Chege, who joined the demonstration, "but today, we said 'enough is enough.'
Because his penis is her problem.
Chege says there's a double standard in how men and women dress in Nairobi. "The men can walk around in shorts and no clothes but no one says anything," she says. "But when a woman dresses a certain way [the men] are not comfortable with, they will strip her naked and violate her most human right."
Local authorities have said they are looking into the incidents, but no one has been arrested so far. Chege wants the government to get more involved, and is angry at Kenyan president Uhuru Kenyatta for remaining silent on the issue.
Men will protect each other's right to abuse a Father's Daughter. To them, the father is shit and so is she. Therefore, it is their right to abuse a Father's Daughter.
"The president has a daughter who's a young girl, and he has a wife," Chege points out. "I wanted my president to speak for the women."
Protesters are calling for a database that lists the names of people who commit sexual assault against women and children. "The police are saying they don't know who the culprits are in the attacks," Chege says, but with one of the assaults caught on video, the police should "rise up and take tangible action."
Chances are, the sons of the police were involved.
Although the attacks have drawn attention to the way women dress in Kenya, Chege says "this is not about mini-skirts," but rather the general treatment of women.
Chege recalls being threatened and assaulted when she was the only woman to run in a local election last year. "The police used to call me every Monday morning to see if I was alive," she says. "Women have contributed so much to Kenyan society ... we cannot have men disrespecting us and violating our daughters, our sisters."
The Fathers of Daughters looked away in shame

Women in Jeddah are becoming increasingly concerned about the rising trend of harassment and have urged the traffic police to be more vigilant in dispensing their duties considering that the reckless young men often chase taxis and cars with women passengers at high speeds posing a risk to fellow motorists and pedestrians.
The women have to ask for protection as the males saw nothing wrong with their behaviour

Another victim, Sameera Zahrani, said that these unruly young men not only harass women on the streets, follow taxis and cars and terrify expatriate drivers but they also harass women pedestrians. Motorist Faroq Ali said: “These youth drive recklessly creating havoc on the roads which could result in terrible accidents or even death. However, as an expatriate, I am afraid to interfere.”

Tariq Abbasi, a visitor from the UK, told Arab News that he was shocked at seeing the way the youth chase women. He said: “We don’t expect this to happen in an Islamic country hosting the two holy cities. In fact, we haven’t seen such things happening on the streets of London.”

Vice president of the Social Science Forum organization and a social scientist, I. Hasan, said that the solution to the problem is to have the traffic police exercise more vigilance on Jeddah’s streets. "They should also be authorized to arrest anyone doing this obnoxious activity and there should be strict laws.”

He added that the "wasta system" should be eliminated as the guilty party takes advantage of its contacts with high officials to obtain a release without punishment.
The Fathers of Daughters also have sons and they are protected.

He said that the guilty youth should stand trial and have the sentence read out to them in the presence of their parents, who should also be warned to reign in their sons or risk facing punishment themselves.
Key word..'should'
© Provided by AFP
Human Rights Watch Tuesday urged Indonesia's national police to halt "discriminatory" virginity tests for women applying to join the force in the world's most populous Muslim-majority country.

The rights group said women applicants are required to be both unmarried and virgins, and the virginity test is still widely used despite the insistence of some senior police officials that the practice has been discontinued.
Some Fathers of Daughters would not allow this, others do.

In a series of interviews with HRW, young women -- including some who underwent the test as recently as this year -- described the procedure as painful and traumatic.

The women told how they were forced to strip naked before female medics gave them a "two-finger test" -- a practice described by HRW as archaic and discredited.

"I don't want to remember those bad experiences. It was humiliating," said one 19-year-woman who took the test in the city of Pekanbaru, on western Sumatra island, and whose identity was not disclosed.

Police did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

While senior police have insisted in recent years that virginity tests for female applicants have been stopped, HRW said a posting on the force's own website this month noted that female applicants must undergo the procedure.

Women currently make up about three percent of the 400,000-strong force, HRW said, but added the police had launched a drive to increase the number of female officers.

Society is deeply conservative in parts of Indonesia and some still value female virginity highly.
The issue hit the headlines last year, when the education chief of a city sparked outrage by suggesting that teenage schoolgirls should undergo virginity tests to enter senior high school.
Some would demand that the Mothers of Daughters should do more to protect their daughters, but if that's true, then what good are the Fathers of Daughters?

Critter world does not believe that humans are the superiour beings

14 15
01 02 13

isis needs new recruits of serial killers and the mentally ill, for Islam

The head of a good man at the feet of a coward
Peter Kassig was beheaded by isis today. It didn't help that he converted to Islam, or that he was a believer. It didn't matter if he was there doing good work, doing good deeds.

It didn't matter that he hadn't killed anyone or run them out of their houses. He was murdered by cowardly, weak men who would have lost had it been a fair fight. One man with a weapon fighting a man who is tied up. Only a wimp could find bravery in that action.

But one thing was different about his murder, he wouldn't make a video. Sources say that he would not co-operate, that he was an ordeal.  I know that meant something to Mr. Kassig.

They can only kill you once.

For muslims who want to live this fantasy life of 7th century desert arabs, using ancient biblical laws for punishments but not for freedom, you'll end up with the same thought. Sure, you'll like the part about one religion, women being better controlled, men being seen as important. But you're not going to like all this blood and guts.  You're not going to want your 3 year old having nightmares about getting their hands or heads chopped off in public. You're not going to like being an imitiation of someone else rather than be who you were born to be.

Will your daughter grow up to be a doctor or a 3rd wife?
And your son? Will he be loved by his wife or barely tolerated, as she did not get a choice in the marriage?

You can quote all the stories/hadith that you want, to prove that you are to live the life of a 7th century desert arab as the prophet bukhari dictated. But there are going to be sons and daughters who will grow to hate you as they learn the truth. The truth that you force upon them will be used as a weapon against you. Deny them the opportunity to learn, to enjoy life as it was intended, to be fully enabled to contribute to all of humanity, and they will rebel.

They will challenge the writings of the old fool bukhari, who went to a freakin fortune teller who told him to write stories. And they will join a growing force who will support your sons and daughters as they walk away from you.

But that's only the sons and daughters that will live to see a future. Your fake caliphate has you on a road of constant wars. You'll be killing shia muslims and other muslims who prefer to follow different stories than you do. Some will believe the stories that music is forbidden whilst others will follow stories that say it is allowed. You'll be spied on by your neighbours and enemies all the time. Fart during prayer and don't wudu and life is over for you. There will always be someone more religious than you...always, always, always.

And instead of living your life for God, you'll live your life to just survive the stories of the prophet bukhari. This will be your legacy.

I don't care if you have a lousy life under biblical rule (for those who don't know, the random killings of adulterers, gays, unbelievers, pagans, apostates, ect. is not in the quran as the quran was supposed to be an upgrade to the former books...funny right? They prefer the old book but still want to call themselves muslim...isn't that in itself blasphemy? Well yes it is. Especially as they don't even know the context of the ancient writings and why they were seen as the upgrade back in the day) but don't go bragging that your violence is for your god, it's because you're a lousy human being who prefers unarmed victims, just like a serial killer. There is no bravery or honour in that, only an eternity of bitter fruit in the pits of the hellfire.

When God looked down at the desert arabs he said, these are the worst of the worst and most in need of a message. Yep, that's what it says about the 7th century desert arabs that you're all trying to imitate.

You shall recite what is revealed to you of your Lord's scripture. Nothing shall abrogate these words, and you shall not find any other source beside it.18:27

Shall I seek other than God as a source of law, when He has revealed to you this book fully detailed? 6:114

But say not - for any false thing that your tongues may put forth,- "This is lawful, and this is forbidden," so as to ascribe false things to God. For those who ascribe false things to God, will never prosper 16:116

This is the Book; in it is guidance sure, without doubt, to those who fear God (2:2)

“And they will say: O our Sustainer! Behold, we paid heed unto our leaders and our great men, and it is they who have led us astray from the right path” ( 33:67)

''But they denied the truth when it came to them, so they are in a confused condition'' (50:5)

And when you preach your Lord using Quran alone, they run away in aversion" (17:46)

"You shall not accept any information, unless you verify it for yourself. I have given you the hearing, the eyesight, and the brain, and you are responsible for using them" (17:36)

3:144 Muhammad is no more than an apostle: many were the apostle that passed away before him. If he died or were slain, will ye then Turn back on your heels? If any did turn back on his heels, not the least harm will he do to Allah. but God will swiftly reward those with gratitude

5:99 The duty of the messenger is only to convey the message. God knows what you proclaim and what you hide

77:50 Then what Message, after that, will they believe in?
25:30 The messenger said, "My Lord, my people have deserted this Quran."
14 15
01 02 13

Fear of Gods in Christian America

I read an article that caused this response. The link to the article is listed below. My opinion comes first.

Bet I could make their heads explode by telling them Muhammad is on the USA Supreme Court Building.

And where do you think the USA got the Noble vision of No Compulsion in Religion? It is not found in the Christian Bible. But it is found in the Quran.

 But why promote hate? I've never seen hate lead to peace, ever. Just look at the mid east with the sunni v shia, they've been killing each other for 1400 years over the title of The Religion of Peace and Tolerance....and they belong to the same religion!

 And Chrisitans, why do I have to remind you that Jesus wasn't a hater? Or that it was your Born Again Christian GW Bush and his pappy who started this religious war?

 If you are indeed the superiour religion, then it should be easier for you to create peace, yes? Even with those who might hate what you have done to their land, to their towns, to their families, to their lives.

 Logically, it would make more sense to let isis see that Americans are not influenced by isis, that they are not afraid of them or of Muslims in general. You got your dogs, god and guns. You should be secure.

From the article;
"Many will argue that our Founding Fathers did not have the Christian faith in mind when developing the political system we all enjoy and other nations covet. However, our own Pledge of Allegiance is evidence of that fact in the line “one nation, under God, indivisible.” Our nation supports maintaining the traditions and principles of these Christian values. What message are we sending to the god of the Christian faith by praying to another?"

"This video is disturbing not because it shows diversity, but because a spiritual leader of a faith that is not peaceful and uses principles of that faith to justify violence against all other religions and people that do not conform to it is leading a prayer in the highest legislative authority in America.
Christians stopped burning people at the stake centuries ago. Why are we allowing a faith where even the “moderate” followers still exact violent persecution to preside and “pray” over our legislative proceedings?"

"The bigger concern is this: who is it in our current leadership that authorized something like this? Have we become so liberalized in our thinking that we are not thinking of the larger ramifications of actions like this?"

** And my fav part, pefect ending;

 "Americans are fighting elements of Sharia law all over the country. It appears yet another piece has been allowed into the House of representatives"

 **That sharia law includes telling Americans that not ALL Americans are to be treated equally under the law, like women, gays and minorities, sciences and of course, other religions. They are to be treated with your religious judgement. Don't say it's not true, it's what you voted for 2 weeks ago....isis was pleased at the common ground.
14 15